Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Paediatric retinal detachment: comparison of high myopia and extreme myopia

Authors: N-K, Wang; Y-P, Chen; C-C, Lai; T-L, Chen; K-J, Yang; Y-H, Kuo; A-N, Chao; +5 Authors

Paediatric retinal detachment: comparison of high myopia and extreme myopia

Abstract

To compare the clinical features and surgical outcomes of paediatric retinal detachment (RD) in high myopia and extreme myopia.The clinical charts of 107 children who experienced RD and had a spherical equivalent (SE) of at least 6.00 dioptres (D) were reviewed. The patients were separated into a high myopia group (SE -6.0 to -10.0 D) and extreme myopia group (SE >-10.0 D). RD characteristics and outcomes were compared between these two groups.There were significant differences between the two groups in total RD (p<0.001), the presence of posterior staphyloma (p<0.001) and some types of breaks. More eyes in the extreme myopia group required vitrectomy after the initial RD repair. In the high myopia group, retinal reattachment was achieved in 79 eyes (97.5%) at the end of the intervention, whereas in the extreme myopia group, retinal reattachment was achieved in 22 eyes (73.3%). Multiple logistic regression showed that a higher refractive error was the only negative predictor of surgical outcome (p = 0.026).Due to differences in aetiologies, clinical characteristics, required surgical procedure after initial repair, surgical and functional outcomes, paediatric RD with extreme myopia should be addressed differently from paediatric RD with high myopia.

Keywords

Male, Adolescent, Retinal Detachment, Taiwan, Scleral Buckling, Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Vitrectomy, Myopia, Degenerative, Myopia, Humans, Female, Treatment Failure, Child, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!