
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of phacoemulsification using torsional modality with different parameter settings for hard nucleus cataract extraction.A prospective, randomised clinical study.A clinical practice study conducted at the Cataract Service, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun-Yat-Sen University, and Guangzhou. One eye each from 198 consecutive patients with cataract density grade IV according to the Emery-Little system classification system, requiring phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation, was included. Eyes were randomly assigned to the Linear Torsional combined with Ultrasound power group (Linear Tor+US group, n = 66), 100% Fixed Torsional group (Fixed Tor group, n = 65) and conventional Ultrasound burst group (US group, n = 67). All surgeries were performed by a single experienced surgeon and outcomes evaluated by another surgeon masked to treatment. Intraoperative parameters were Ultrasound Time (UST), Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) and surgical complications. Patients were examined on post-op days 1, 7 and 30. Postoperative outcomes were final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), average central and incisional corneal thickness and central endothelial cell counts.The mean UST was lower in the Fixed Tor group than in the US group and in the Lin US+Tor group (p0.01), greater average central corneal and incisional thickness on days 1, 7 (p0.01), and higher average corneal endothelial cell losses on day 7 and 30 days (p
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Phacoemulsification, Ultrasonic Therapy, Endothelium, Corneal, Visual Acuity, Lens Nucleus, Crystalline, Original Articles, Middle Aged, Cornea, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Aged
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Phacoemulsification, Ultrasonic Therapy, Endothelium, Corneal, Visual Acuity, Lens Nucleus, Crystalline, Original Articles, Middle Aged, Cornea, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 68 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
