Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ British Journal of O...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Is intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) safe?

Authors: S Michels;

Is intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) safe?

Abstract

Can a drug be safe if an FDA warning has been issued for it? Can a drug for which a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning has been issued be safe? The question of safety using off-label intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin Genentech, South San Francisco, California, USA; Roche AG, Basle, Switzerland) is a concern among ophthalmologists around the globe. This is one of the key aspects of The international intravitreal bevacizumab safety survey: using the internet to assess drug safety worldwide published by A Fung et al 1 ( see page xxx ). Why else would 70 centres from 12 countries voluntarily report on >7000 injections in >5000 patients using an internet-based questionnaire within just 6 months? The safety survey reported no drug-related adverse events for intravitreal bevacizumab injections beyond the level of incidence rates seen in control groups of current anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) trials in ophthalmology. No single adverse event reported was above 0.21% over a mean follow-up of 3.5 months. On the one hand, a self-reported safety survey may have the risk of underestimating adverse events, which was discussed by the authors; on the other hand, hardly any prospective clinical trial would be able to obtain safety data from such a diversity of centres, using different techniques for preparing and injecting bevacizumab and for …

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze