
Enlargement of laser scars after retinal argon laser photocoagulation can give rise to deterioration in visual acuity. Subthreshold micropulse diode laser may decrease this risk. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of subthreshold micropulse diode laser (810 nm) and conventional argon laser (514 nm) photocoagulation for the treatment of clinically significant macular oedema in diabetic patients.23 eyes of 16 patients were randomised to either treatment. Follow up was conducted for a minimum of 5 months. Changes in visual acuity and macular oedema measured by optical coherence tomography were examined.Visual acuity remained stable in all treatment groups throughout the observation period. Changes in retinal thickness were small both foveally and perifoveally. In patients with focal macular oedema a significant reduction in retinal thickness (9% approximately -26 microm, p = 0.02) was seen foveally 3 months after diode laser photocoagulation.Subthreshold micropulse diode laser and conventional argon laser treatment showed an equally good effect on visual acuity. Subthreshold micropulse diode laser showed a stabilising or even improving effect on macular oedema. The combination of primary diode laser and supplementary argon laser might be particularly favourable in reducing diabetic macular oedema.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Reoperation, Diabetic Retinopathy, Laser Coagulation, Visual Acuity, Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Macular Edema, Retina, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Reoperation, Diabetic Retinopathy, Laser Coagulation, Visual Acuity, Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Macular Edema, Retina, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 175 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
