Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Archives of Disease ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

G15(P) Paediatricians' Competence and Attitudes Towards Their Diagnostic Radiology Skills

Authors: A Tabor; M Sundaram; M Jawad;

G15(P) Paediatricians' Competence and Attitudes Towards Their Diagnostic Radiology Skills

Abstract

Aims Many clinicians find themselves self-interpreting the radiological images of their patients, especially in the acute management setting whilst on-call. The aim of this study was to assess the competence and attitudes of paediatric clinicians towards their diagnostic radiology skills. Methods We conducted a nine item self-administered questionnaire on 48 trainees and paediatricians. The domains of this questionnaire included previous formal training in diagnostic radiology at different stages of training, indication for self-taught radiology and satisfaction in current knowledge towards interpreting different types of radiology imaging. We also asked if there was an x-ray meeting in their department and whether there was a need for formal training in diagnostic radiology. Descriptive data were obtained. Results 39.6% (n = 19) of our respondents were consultants and 41.7% (n = 20) were registrars or associate specialists, all of which had a formal x-ray meeting in their current department. There was a significant difference between the number of respondents who attended a formal course in radiology interpretation, and those who were self-taught (18.8% vs. 87.5% p Conclusion The wide variation in methods, yet high prevalence of self-taught diagnostic radiology highlights a need for formal training, reinforced by the fact that nearly all respondents’ feel formal teaching is necessary.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze