
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Aims Many clinicians find themselves self-interpreting the radiological images of their patients, especially in the acute management setting whilst on-call. The aim of this study was to assess the competence and attitudes of paediatric clinicians towards their diagnostic radiology skills. Methods We conducted a nine item self-administered questionnaire on 48 trainees and paediatricians. The domains of this questionnaire included previous formal training in diagnostic radiology at different stages of training, indication for self-taught radiology and satisfaction in current knowledge towards interpreting different types of radiology imaging. We also asked if there was an x-ray meeting in their department and whether there was a need for formal training in diagnostic radiology. Descriptive data were obtained. Results 39.6% (n = 19) of our respondents were consultants and 41.7% (n = 20) were registrars or associate specialists, all of which had a formal x-ray meeting in their current department. There was a significant difference between the number of respondents who attended a formal course in radiology interpretation, and those who were self-taught (18.8% vs. 87.5% p Conclusion The wide variation in methods, yet high prevalence of self-taught diagnostic radiology highlights a need for formal training, reinforced by the fact that nearly all respondents’ feel formal teaching is necessary.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
