<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
It is not entirely possible to prevent hospital cross-infection in infantile gastroenteritis by the use of conventional barrier-nursing techniques, even with experienced staff in well-designed wards. An incident of double cross-infection due to enteropathic Esch. coli types O119 and O126 and the measures that were taken to control it are described. The type O119 infections were clinically severe, and the cases showed significant levels of serum antibody to the organism, while the type O126 infections were clinically mild and no antibody was produced. The use of the antibiotic colistin, to which both organisms were originally sensitive, may have been of some value in clearing the type O119 infection but was without effect on the type O126 infection, which continued to spread during treatment. A degree of resistance to colistin was found in some strains of the type O126 organism isolated after treatment. The outbreaks largely ended spontaneously, but may have been limited in extent by the administrative measures described. The use of antibiotics in infantile gastroenteritis is reviewed and a plea is made for a modern large-scale trial to reassess their value.
Cross Infection, Colistin, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Patient Isolators, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Antibodies, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Disease Outbreaks, Gastroenteritis, Humans, Hospital Design and Construction, Escherichia coli Infections
Cross Infection, Colistin, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Patient Isolators, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Antibodies, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Disease Outbreaks, Gastroenteritis, Humans, Hospital Design and Construction, Escherichia coli Infections
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |