Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Molecular and Cellul...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Molecular and Cellular Biology
Article . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
License: ASM Journals Non-Commercial TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Clusters of S1 Nuclease-Hypersensitive Sites Induced In Vivo by DNA Damage

Authors: J, Legault; A, Tremblay; D, Ramotar; M E, Mirault;

Clusters of S1 Nuclease-Hypersensitive Sites Induced In Vivo by DNA Damage

Abstract

DNA end-labeling procedures were used to analyze both the frequency and distribution of DNA strand breaks in mammalian cells exposed or not to different types of DNA-damaging agents. The 3' ends were labeled by T4 DNA polymerase-catalyzed nucleotide exchange carried out in the absence or presence of Escherichia coli endonuclease IV to cleave abasic sites and remove 3' blocking groups. Using this sensitive assay, we show that DNA isolated from human cells or mouse tissues contains variable basal levels of DNA strand interruptions which are associated with normal bioprocesses, including DNA replication and repair. On the other hand, distinct dose-dependent patterns of DNA damage were assessed quantitatively in cultured human cells exposed briefly to menadione, methylmethane sulfonate, topoisomerase II inhibitors, or gamma rays. In vivo induction of single-strand breaks and abasic sites by methylmethane sulfonate was also measured in several mouse tissues. The genomic distribution of these lesions was investigated by DNA cleavage with the single-strand-specific S1 nuclease. Strikingly similar cleavage patterns were obtained with all DNA-damaging agents tested, indicating that the majority of S1-hypersensitive sites detected were not randomly distributed over the genome but apparently were clustered in damage-sensitive regions. The parallel disappearance of 3' ends and loss of S1-hypersensitive sites during post-gamma-irradiation repair periods indicates that these sites were rapidly repaired single-strand breaks or gaps (2- to 3-min half-life). Comparison of S1 cleavage patterns obtained with gamma-irradiated DNA and gamma-irradiated cells shows that chromatin structure was the primary determinant of the distribution of the DNA damage detected.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Escherichia coli Proteins, Single-Strand Specific DNA and RNA Endonucleases, Lyases, Antineoplastic Agents, DNA, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, Methyl Methanesulfonate, Catalysis, Chromatin, Deoxyribonuclease IV (Phage T4-Induced), Hemostatics, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, DNA Nucleotidylexotransferase, DNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) Lyase, Animals, Humans, Streptonigrin, DNA Damage, Teniposide

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    31
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
31
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze