<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A plaque technique for the assay of Rickettsia rickettsii is described. The method employs primary chick or green monkey kidney monolayer cell cultures with either an agarose or special Noble agar overlay. Plaques were counted in 6 days and resultant titers correlated well with ld 50 end points obtained by a standard assay in embryonated eggs. Identification of the plaque-forming organisms was accomplished by direct observation of rickettsiae-like bodies in the monolayer lesions, inhibition of plaques by antibiotics, sensitivity of plaques to specific immune serum, and failure to cultivate other microorganisms from the infected cells. Versatility of the test was demonstrated by assaying samples of rickettsiae from several different sources commonly used in our laboratory. These included infected yolk sacs, various cell cultures, and infected guinea pig tissue. Sufficient numbers of viable rickettsiae were present in the cells of a single lesion to permit direct recovery.
Bacteriological Techniques, Culture Techniques, Immune Sera, Methods, Rickettsia rickettsii, Streptomycin, Animals, Chick Embryo, Haplorhini, Penicillins, Kidney, Culture Media
Bacteriological Techniques, Culture Techniques, Immune Sera, Methods, Rickettsia rickettsii, Streptomycin, Animals, Chick Embryo, Haplorhini, Penicillins, Kidney, Culture Media
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 53 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |