<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The efficiency of two types of antigen slides was compared by using the indirect fluorescent-antibody technique. Fifty sera from infectious mononucleosis patients were tested concurrently on the two sets of slides for antibody to Epstein-Barr virus. The indirect fluorescent-antibody serum titer readings from the epoxy slides were either equal to or twofold higher than those from the cover slip slides.
Herpesvirus 4, Human, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Antibodies, Viral, Diagnosis, Differential, Ethers, Cyclic, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Methods, Serologic Tests, Infectious Mononucleosis, Antigens, Viral
Herpesvirus 4, Human, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Antibodies, Viral, Diagnosis, Differential, Ethers, Cyclic, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Methods, Serologic Tests, Infectious Mononucleosis, Antigens, Viral
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |