In vitro susceptibilities of Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas sobria, and Aeromonas caviae to 22 antimicrobial agents

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jul 1985 English Publisher:American Society for MicrobiologyJournal:Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, volume 28, pages 151-153 (issn: 0066-4804, eissn: 1098-6596,

Copyright policy )

Authors: M R, Motyl; G, McKinley; J M, Janda;

doi: 10.1128/aac.28.1.151

pmid: 4037775

pmc: PMC176330

In vitro susceptibilities of Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas sobria, and Aeromonas caviae to 22 antimicrobial agents

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

MICs of 22 antimicrobial agents for 60 strains of three Aeromonas species were determined by a microdilution method. The newer cephalosporins such as moxalactam, cefotaxime, and cefoperazone, the aminoglycosides, and chloramphenicol, tetracycline, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole inhibited most of the strains studied. Within the genus, A. hydrophila was more resistant than either A. caviae or A. sobria to the antibiotics tested.

Related Organizations

Mount Sinai Hospital
United States
Montefiore Hospital
United Kingdom

Keywords

Species Specificity, Humans, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Aeromonas, Bacterial Infections, Child, Anti-Bacterial Agents

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	105
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%