
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>This chapter briefly reviews the structural data available, identifies similarities and differences, and illustrates some difficulties in using the structures of isolated components for insertion into the structures of whole ribosomes or subunits determined at lower resolution. An awareness of the possible differences in structure is necessary for an appreciation of the usefulness of structural studies of isolated components from a larger system such as the ribosome. The fraction of ribosomal proteins that has been structurally characterized is now more than one-third of all ribosomal proteins from bacteria. The chapter focuses on the domain arrangement of ribosomal proteins, and structural motifs. The extended conformations of some ribosomal proteins can be compared to proteins like calmodulin, which has a very elongated structure in one state while the α-helix that separates the two domains becomes bent in another state, with the effect that the protein adopts a more globular structure. L1 is a two-domain protein. The structure of L1 from Thermus thermophilus shows the two domains in close contact. Domain II can be described as an insert in domain I. Thus, there are two connections between the domains. The structural investigations have clearly established that the ribosomal proteins are formed by stable domains with significant hydrophobic cores that would hardly alter their structures upon binding to the ribosome. Several ribosomal proteins are built of two or more domains, sometimes with significant flexibility between them. Long, more or less flexible loops also frequently occur in ribosomal proteins.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).  | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.  | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).  | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.  | Average | 
