Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Cohesin-Dockerin Interactions and Folding

Authors: J. H. David Wu; Michael Newcomb; Kazuo Sakka;

Cohesin-Dockerin Interactions and Folding

Abstract

Many investigations were conducted to characterize the cohesin-dockerin interactions. These studies include measuring cohesin-dockerin affinity, identifying critical amino acid residues by site-directed mutagenesis, and determining the molecular structures of the dockerin, cohesin, and its complex. Cohesins are highly conserved within the same scaffolding protein, with sequence identities higher than 50%. The interactions between the cohesin of the Clostridium thermocellum CipA scaffolding protein and the dockerin of cellulosomal catalytic components are categorized as type I, and the interactions between the dockerin of CipA and its counterpart are categorized as type II. The type I cohesins and dockerins include those modules from different microorganisms. This classification, however, is based on sequence homology and does not necessarily imply recognition among the same type of modules. Indeed, interspecies specificity was demonstrated using cohesins and dockerins from C. thermocellum and Clostridium cellulolyticum, respectively. In this work, Pages et al. found that C. thermocellum Cel48A (i.e., CelS), with its dockerin, did not recognize cohesin 1 of the C. cellulolyticum scaffolding protein CipC. The extremely high affinity between cohesin and dockerin and their important roles in cellulosome assembly have prompted interest in determining their molecular structures to elucidate the molecular mechanism of the cohesin-dockerin recognition. The first success in X-ray crystallography of a cohesin-dockerin complex was brought about by using a crystal of the dockerin of C. thermocellum Xyn10B and cohesin 2 of CipA, coexpressed in Escherichia coli and purified as a complex, yielding a good crystal suitable for X-ray analysis.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!