
Kelp forests support biodiversity, human livelihoods, and essential ecosystem services along 30% of the world’s coasts, but they are under threat from marine heatwaves, harvesting, pollution, and overfishing (1). Despite increased advocacy for their global protection, including the International Union for Conservation of Nature Seaweed Specialist Group (2) and the Kelp Forest Challenge (3), the social and ecological losses from kelp forest degradation continue to grow (4). Political action will be required at national and international levels to coordinate and implement strategic, integrated, tangible protection measures for kelp forests globally (5). Most countries have committed to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and pledged to effectively protect and manage 30% of marine ecosystems by 2030 (6), particularly those critical for biodiversity. However, only 2.9% of the ocean is currently inside fully protected Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) (7), which are the most effective tool for biodiversity conservation (7) and climate resilience (8). Moreover, the framework does not specify which ecosystems should be prioritized.About 35% of floating kelp forests are located in the waters of Latin American countries (9), which remain far from meeting the 2030 targets. Mexico has lost more than 50% of its kelp forests as a result of recent marine heatwaves (10). Chile and Peru have witnessed large-scale degradation from direct extraction (11), leading to drastic biodiversity loss.
Fil: Lagger, Cristian Fabian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; Argentina
Fil: Micheli, Fiorenza. Universidad Autonoma de Baja California (universidad Baja California);
Fil: Possingham, Hugh. Universidad Autonoma de Baja California (universidad Baja California);
Fil: Montaño Moctezuma, Gabriela. California State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mora Soto, Alejandra. University Of Victoria. Dept.of Biology; Canadá
Fil: Aburto Oropeza, Octavio. California State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: García Pantoja, Jessica. California State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Guajardo, Eduardo. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: Olguín Jacobson, Carolina. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
1300 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, CONSERVATION, 1706 Computer Science Applications, 2204 Biomedical Engineering, BIODIVERSITY, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, KELP FOREST
1300 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, CONSERVATION, 1706 Computer Science Applications, 2204 Biomedical Engineering, BIODIVERSITY, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, KELP FOREST
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
