Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao CONICET Digitalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
CONICET Digital
Article . 2024
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: CONICET Digital
Science
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
UQ eSpace
Article . 2024
Data sources: UQ eSpace
UQ eSpace
Article . 2024
Data sources: UQ eSpace
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Protect kelp forests

Authors: Arafeh Dalmau, Nur; Olguín Jacobson, Carolina; Earle, Sylvia; Bello, Max; Lagger, Cristian Fabian; Mora Soto, Alejandra; Pantano, Carolina; +16 Authors

Protect kelp forests

Abstract

Kelp forests support biodiversity, human livelihoods, and essential ecosystem services along 30% of the world’s coasts, but they are under threat from marine heatwaves, harvesting, pollution, and overfishing (1). Despite increased advocacy for their global protection, including the International Union for Conservation of Nature Seaweed Specialist Group (2) and the Kelp Forest Challenge (3), the social and ecological losses from kelp forest degradation continue to grow (4). Political action will be required at national and international levels to coordinate and implement strategic, integrated, tangible protection measures for kelp forests globally (5). Most countries have committed to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and pledged to effectively protect and manage 30% of marine ecosystems by 2030 (6), particularly those critical for biodiversity. However, only 2.9% of the ocean is currently inside fully protected Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) (7), which are the most effective tool for biodiversity conservation (7) and climate resilience (8). Moreover, the framework does not specify which ecosystems should be prioritized.About 35% of floating kelp forests are located in the waters of Latin American countries (9), which remain far from meeting the 2030 targets. Mexico has lost more than 50% of its kelp forests as a result of recent marine heatwaves (10). Chile and Peru have witnessed large-scale degradation from direct extraction (11), leading to drastic biodiversity loss.

Fil: Lagger, Cristian Fabian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; Argentina

Fil: Micheli, Fiorenza. Universidad Autonoma de Baja California (universidad Baja California);

Fil: Possingham, Hugh. Universidad Autonoma de Baja California (universidad Baja California);

Fil: Montaño Moctezuma, Gabriela. California State University; Estados Unidos

Fil: Mora Soto, Alejandra. University Of Victoria. Dept.of Biology; Canadá

Fil: Aburto Oropeza, Octavio. California State University; Estados Unidos

Fil: García Pantoja, Jessica. California State University; Estados Unidos

Fil: Guajardo, Eduardo. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile

Fil: Olguín Jacobson, Carolina. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos

Country
Argentina
Keywords

1300 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, CONSERVATION, 1706 Computer Science Applications, 2204 Biomedical Engineering, BIODIVERSITY, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, KELP FOREST

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!