
pmid: 1502558
The proposal by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to patent products resulting merely from sequencing the human genome is a mistake: at worst, it is wrong in patent law; at best, it relies on deficiencies in law concerning what is "useful" as a requirement for patents. The proposal is symptomatic of a problem besieging biotechnology—attempts to control the raw material of scientific experimentation before research has determined the practical value of such material—that needs curing on many fronts. Corrective measures are proposed for adoption by the Executive branch, the Congress, and the courts.
Base Sequence, Genome, Human, Judicial Role, Federal Government, DNA, United States, Patents as Topic, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Government Regulation, Humans, Supreme Court Decisions, Biotechnology
Base Sequence, Genome, Human, Judicial Role, Federal Government, DNA, United States, Patents as Topic, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Government Regulation, Humans, Supreme Court Decisions, Biotechnology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
