
Stochastic or Asymmetric Fate Determination? During an adaptive immune response, B lymphocytes rapidly divide and differentiate into effector cell populations, including antibody-secreting plasmablasts and memory B cells. Many also change the class of antibody they secrete, through a process called isotype switching. During this process, some cells die. Whether cells acquire these different fates in a stochastic or programmed manner, however, is unclear. Duffy et al. (p. 338 , published online 5 January) used single-cell tracking to determine the times to division, differentiation into a plasmablast, isotype switching, and death of stimulated B lymphocytes. Statistical analysis and mathematical modeling revealed that these cell-fate decisions appear to be the result of random clocks: Which clock went off first (division, differentiation, or death), determined the fate of the cell. Barnett et al. (p. 342 , published online 15 December) sought to determine whether asymmetrical cell division, which is thought to contribute to effector cell-fate decisions in T cells, may be at work in B lymphocytes. Indeed, factors important for the initiation and maintenance of germinal center B lymphocyte identity, along with an ancestral polarity protein, were asymmetrically distributed and maintained their asymmetry during cell division.
B-Lymphocytes, Asymmetric Cell Division, Cell Polarity, Mitosis, Cell Communication, Germinal Center, DNA-Binding Proteins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Protein Kinase C zeta, Cellular Microenvironment, Cell Adhesion, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-6, Animals, Immunization, Receptors, Interleukin-21, CD40 Antigens, Cues, Protein Kinase C
B-Lymphocytes, Asymmetric Cell Division, Cell Polarity, Mitosis, Cell Communication, Germinal Center, DNA-Binding Proteins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Protein Kinase C zeta, Cellular Microenvironment, Cell Adhesion, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-6, Animals, Immunization, Receptors, Interleukin-21, CD40 Antigens, Cues, Protein Kinase C
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 99 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
