
pmc: PMC11601796 , PMC12315973
arXiv: 2411.13120
Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) enables untargeted, highly multiplexed mapping of molecular species in biological tissue with unparalleled chemical specificity and sensitivity. However, most IMS platforms lack microscopy-level spatial resolution and cellular morphological contrast, necessitating subsequent histochemical staining, microscopic imaging, and advanced image registration to correlate/link molecular distributions with specific tissue features and cell types. We present a diffusion model–based virtual histological staining approach that enhances spatial resolution and digitally introduces cellular morphological contrast into mass spectrometry images of label-free human tissue. Blind testing on human kidney tissue demonstrated that the virtually stained images of label-free samples closely match their histochemically stained counterparts (with periodic acid–Schiff staining), showing high concordance in identifying key renal pathology structures despite using IMS data with 10-fold larger pixel size. Additionally, our approach uses optimized noise sampling during the diffusion model’s inference to achieve reliable and repeatable virtual staining. We believe this virtual staining method will open avenues for IMS-based biomedical research.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Medical Physics, Staining and Labeling, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), FOS: Physical sciences, Optics, Kidney, Mass Spectrometry, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Machine Learning, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Medical Physics (physics.med-ph), Optics (physics.optics)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Medical Physics, Staining and Labeling, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), FOS: Physical sciences, Optics, Kidney, Mass Spectrometry, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Machine Learning, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Medical Physics (physics.med-ph), Optics (physics.optics)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
