
There comes a time in every academic life when the level of responsibility becomes terrifying. In my five years at Science Advances, first as an associate and then as a deputy editor, there was always a benevolent superpower at the top – it had never intervened but its existence created a peace of mind. Suddenly, the superpower emails and puts you in charge. “Relax, nobody is ever ready. If academics were trained to lead, I would not have a job,” – our Editor-in-Chief has a high signal-to-noise ratio; that one phrase, in a late-night Zoom call across the Atlantic, quelled my panic at being asked to look after the huge Physical and Materials Science section at Science Advances: 11 deputy editors (DEs) and 85 associate editors (AEs), all of them stronger scientists than I am. An intake of breath, a careful read through the responsibilities, an update to the calendar – all right, let’s do it. “Good,” – the Editorial Office said – “would you now please write a column explaining your vision for the Physical and Materials Science section to our readership?”
Editorial
Editorial
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
