Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Drug Metabolism and ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

STEREOSELECTIVE PHARMACOKINETICS OF FLUOXETINE AND NORFLUOXETINE ENANTIOMERS IN PREGNANT SHEEP

Authors: John, Kim; K Wayne, Riggs; Dan W, Rurak;

STEREOSELECTIVE PHARMACOKINETICS OF FLUOXETINE AND NORFLUOXETINE ENANTIOMERS IN PREGNANT SHEEP

Abstract

We examined the stereoselective disposition of fluoxetine (FX) and its metabolite norfluoxetine (NFX) in five pregnant sheep. Racemic FX was administered i.v. to the ewe (50 mg) and the fetus (10 mg) on separate occasions. Maternal and fetal blood, maternal urine, and fetal amniotic and tracheal fluid samples were collected for 72 h. FX and NFX isomers were quantified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. They rapidly crossed the placenta [maternal to fetal area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) ratios 0.59 and 0.65, respectively]. There was significant FX stereoselectivity with S/R FX AUC ratios averaging 1.65 +/- 0.33 and 1.73 +/- 0.29 in ewe and fetus, respectively, after maternal dosing. The maternal clearance and volume of distribution were also higher for (R)-fluoxetine than for (S)-fluoxetine. FX, NFX, and their glucuronides were present in maternal urine but accounted for only 3.4% of maternal drug elimination. In contrast, NFX was not detected in the fetus after fetal FX administration, which is consistent with the absence of measurable fetal nonplacental clearance of the drug and the lack of NFX formation in fetal hepatic microsomal incubations. There was also no fetal production of FX and NFX glucuronides in vivo. Both FX and NFX were extensively and stereoselectively bound in maternal and fetal plasma, with the free fraction S/R FX ratio averaging 0.46 +/- 0.06 and 0.58 +/- 0.10 in ewe and fetus, respectively. Thus, FX exhibits extensive stereoselective disposition, which is likely due to differential plasma protein binding of the FX isomers, and there is no detectable fetal formation of NFX, FX, and NFX glucuronides.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Sheep, Time Factors, Stereoisomerism, In Vitro Techniques, Fetus, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System, Pregnancy, Area Under Curve, Fluoxetine, Microsomes, Liver, Animals, Pregnancy, Animal, Female, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Half-Life

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    38
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
38
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!