
pmid: 15932954
The aim of this study was to evaluate a unified method for predicting human in vivo intrinsic clearance (CL(int, in vivo)) and hepatic clearance (CL(h)) from in vitro data in hepatocytes and microsomes by applying the unbound fraction in blood (fu(b)) and in vitro incubations (fu(inc)). Human CL(int, in vivo) was projected using in vitro data together with biological scaling factors and compared with the unbound intrinsic clearance (CL(int, ub, in vivo)) estimated from clinical data using liver models with and without the various fu terms. For incubations conducted with fetal calf serum (n=14), the observed CL(int, in vivo) was modeled well assuming fu(inc) and fu(b) were equivalent. CL(int, ub, in vivo) was predicted best using both fu(b) and fu(inc) for other hepatocyte data (n=56; r(2)=0.78, p=3.3 x 10(-19), average fold error=5.2). A similar model for CL(int, ub, in vivo) was established for microsomal data (n=37; r(2)=0.77, p=1.2 x 10(-12), average fold error=6.1). Using the model for CL(int, ub, in vivo) (including a further empirical scaling factor), the CL(h) in humans was also calculated according to the well stirred liver model for the most extensive dataset. CL(int, in vivo) and CL(h) were both predicted well using in vitro human data from several laboratories for acidic, basic, and neutral drugs. The direct use of this model using only in vitro human data to predict the metabolic component of CL(h) is attractive, as it does not require extra information from preclinical studies in animals.
Metabolic Clearance Rate, Models, Biological, Culture Media, Serum-Free, Liver, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Culture Media, Conditioned, Microsomes, Hepatocytes, Animals, Humans, Cattle, Pharmacokinetics, Cells, Cultured
Metabolic Clearance Rate, Models, Biological, Culture Media, Serum-Free, Liver, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Culture Media, Conditioned, Microsomes, Hepatocytes, Animals, Humans, Cattle, Pharmacokinetics, Cells, Cultured
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 331 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
