<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1123/pes.24.2.210
pmid: 22728413
The effects of caffeine on anaerobic exercise in young boys was investigated. Twenty-four healthy 8–10 year old boys participated in a randomized doubleblind, double-crossover, counter-balanced study. Each subject received the caffeinated drink (CAF—5 mg · kg−1) or placebo (PL) twice each on four separate visits. Sixty minutes following ingestion of either CAF or PL boys performed a static hand-grip test and then a Wingate test. Reliability was moderately high for the Wingate test (R = .70–0.95). Hand-grip reliability was higher for CAF (R = .88) than PL (R = .52). Mean power (180 ± 36 vs 173 ± 28 W) was significantly higher (p < .05) in CAF versus PL, respectively. There were no differences in peak power or static hand-grip maximal voluntary contraction with CAF. Further, peak HR (190 ± 10 vs 185 ± 10 beats · min−1) was significantly higher in CAF versus PL, respectively. Thus, in this study a moderately high dose of CAF significantly increased the average power during a Wingate test, yet it does not affect peak power or static hand-grip strength.
Male, Analysis of Variance, Cross-Over Studies, Ergometry, Hand Strength, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Adipose Tissue, Double-Blind Method, Caffeine, Isometric Contraction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Exercise Test, Humans, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Child
Male, Analysis of Variance, Cross-Over Studies, Ergometry, Hand Strength, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Adipose Tissue, Double-Blind Method, Caffeine, Isometric Contraction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Exercise Test, Humans, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Child
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |