
pmid: 19116442
For the sole purpose of developing knee-fl exor strength, power, and size, almost any weight room or training facility is equipped with a prone, face-down leg-curl weight-stack machine. Such commercially available machines all aim at targeting and isolating the knee-fl exor muscle group. Depending on mechanical design, they differ somewhat with regard to external torque offered and hence muscle use in the desired range of motion. Given the high rate of injury reported for the fl exormuscle group in athletes relying on high horizontal speed and power 1 and the fact that leg-curl machines are frequently used both in prevention and rehabilitation of hamstring injuries, the scant information describing the basic kinematics of this exercise is rather surprising. 2,3 A novel leg-curl device (YoYo™ Technology AB, Stockholm, Sweden) uses the inertia offered by rotating fl ywheels to provide resistance. Contrary to traditional weight-stack machines, this loading feature allows for exercise with eccentric overload, as shown elsewhere for confi gurations aimed at other muscle groups. 4-6 With use of the fl ywheel leg curl, an 8-week training program improved maximal running speed and, perhaps even more important, reduced the incidence of hamstring strains in elite soccer players. 7 Unfortunately, force–velocity profi les and electromyographic (EMG) activity during concentric–eccentric actions on this device were never examined. Here, we report kinematic data in athletes performing all-out knee fl exions at different inertial settings using this particular fl ywheel confi guration.
Adult, Male, Knee Joint, Resistance Training, Equipment Design, Biomechanical Phenomena, Young Adult, Torque, Humans, Range of Motion, Articular, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Contraction
Adult, Male, Knee Joint, Resistance Training, Equipment Design, Biomechanical Phenomena, Young Adult, Torque, Humans, Range of Motion, Articular, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Contraction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 83 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
