Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0002...
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.004...
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Using co-prime arrays to reduce the number of array elements in ultrasonic imaging

Authors: Satoshi Nakayama; Norio Tagawa;

Using co-prime arrays to reduce the number of array elements in ultrasonic imaging

Abstract

Reducing the number of array elements in ultrasonic imaging is crucial for lowering system cost and improving scalability. This study introduces a co-prime array configuration to achieve high-resolution imaging with fewer elements. A co-prime array synthesizes a beam pattern equivalent to that of an array with N×M elements by multiplying the beam patterns of two subarrays with co-prime numbers of elements. Thus, only N+M elements are required, enabling significant hardware reduction without degrading spatial resolution. Previous study applied the co-prime array concept to reflective transmit/receive systems in plane-wave coherent imaging to reduce transmission. There, transmit angles were treated analogously to array elements, allowing angular sampling to be minimized. In contrast, we target divergent wave synthetic aperture imaging and implement co-prime subarrays directly in the transducer layout. To replicate the beam pattern of a full N×M array, we employ both dense/dense and sparse/sparse Tx/Rx combinations. Experiments with N = M = 8 achieved azimuth and range FWHMs of 0.24 mm and 0.21 mm, CR of 16.50 dB, and SNR of 1.42 which are comparable to or better thana 64-elements conventional array. This confirms that our approach provides high image quality while significantly reducing the number of elements required.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!