Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Deficits in “aided” hearing: The role of distorted tonotopy in sensorineural hearing loss

Authors: Hari Bharadwaj; Satyabrata Parida; Homeira I. Kafi; Joshua M. Alexander; Michael G. Heinz;

Deficits in “aided” hearing: The role of distorted tonotopy in sensorineural hearing loss

Abstract

Restoration of audibility through frequency-specific amplification is central to the clinical management of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Yet, patients often struggle to understand audible speech, especially in noisy environments. These suprathreshold deficits are conventionally attributed to reduced frequency selectivity and to non-peripheral factors. However, our cross-species studies show that damage to cochlear hair cells not only broadens auditory filter “tips” as previously recognized, but can also distort the fundamental tonotopy of the cochlea such that the temporal responses of the base are commandeered by “off-frequency” (i.e., low-frequency) sound fluctuations through overzealous filter “tails.” This effect is especially pronounced with naturalistic stimuli and background noise possessing pink-like spectra, which contain intense low-frequency components alongside softer but informative higher-frequency content. In a chinchilla model of SNHL with noise-induced permanent threshold shifts, single-unit auditory-nerve measurements revealed that hypersensitive tuning-curve tails were the dominant driver of degraded speech envelope coding, even with sound amplifier gains akin to modern hearing aids. In parallel human studies, individuals with mild or moderate SNHL showed hypersensitive tuning-curve tails linked to impaired speech envelope tracking as measured through electroencephalography. Crucially, individual differences in the estimated degree of distorted tonotopy predicted aided speech-in-noise outcomes.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!