Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

(Non)assimilation of consonant clusters in phonological conditioning: An acoustic study

Authors: Gifty Osei-Bonsu; Charlotte F. Lomotey;

(Non)assimilation of consonant clusters in phonological conditioning: An acoustic study

Abstract

In phonological conditioning, phonemes become assimilated to match the properties of adjacent phonemes. At the syllable coda morpheme boundary in the English language, these morphemic elements express grammatical features of marking number (plural) and genitive ( singular and plural possession ) in regular nouns, and the 3rd person singular and past tense in regular verbs. These morphemes create consonant clusters that are expected to assimilate for easy production (or linguistic economy). Unfortunately, it has been revealed that non-native speakers do not always assimilate the consonants to reflect this conditioning. This study investigates the (non)assimilation of consonant clusters in phonological conditioning from an acoustic perspective. It uncovers the patterns of phonological conditioning that are derived from (non)assimilation of consonant clusters in Ghanaian English and the factors that account for such patterns using the Speech Learning Model (SLM) by Flege (1995) and the Markedness Differential Hypothesis by Ekman (1977). Six (6) hours of data recorded from 50 Ghanaians were subjected to auditory and acoustic analyses. Results indicate that Ghanaian speakers of English sometimes assimilate these phonological endings correctly but mostly deviate from inner circle expectations. Typically, while they assimilate the voiceless endings, the voiced endings most often pose a challenge to them. Keywords: assimilation, consonant clusters, phonological conditioning, morphophonemic orthography, markedness

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!