Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Testing phenomenological auditory-nerve model predictions for selective inner- and outer-hair-cell dysfunction

Authors: Madhurima Patra; Andrew Sivaprakasam; David Axe; Michael G. Heinz;

Testing phenomenological auditory-nerve model predictions for selective inner- and outer-hair-cell dysfunction

Abstract

Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) effects on neural coding and perception have been largely associated with outer-hair-cell (OHC) dysfunction (e.g., reduced cochlear gain, reduced compression, broadened tuning). However, both inner-hair-cell (IHC) and OHC dysfunction occur in common hearing-loss etiologies, e.g., noise-induced and age-related (metabolic). Although IHC effects are largely ignored based on the insensitivity of audiograms to IHC loss up to 80%, the same selective IHC damage affects suprathreshold hearing (e.g., tone-in-noise detection, EFRs to periodic stimuli). Phenomenological auditory-nerve (AN) models are useful for studying neural-coding effects of SNHL, but their parametric control of OHC and IHC function (e.g., cohc and cihc parameters, Bruce et al., 2018) are designed based on data from animals with noise-induced hearing loss (OHC/IHC dysfunction combined). Although this approach has proven successful for OHC effects, testing of IHC-based effects has been largely indirect. Here, we compare model predictions to our previously collected AN-fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli in animals with either carboplatin-induced selective IHC dysfunction or gentamicin-induced selective OHC damage to provide more direct testing of IHC and OHC effects. Model parameters were estimated from histology, ABR thresholds, AN-fiber rates, and spike-train statistical metrics (e.g., vector strength, discriminability, mutual information).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!