Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

High fidelity hearing protection devices: Attenuation in human ears and manikin devices

Authors: Colleen Le Prell; Tess Zaccardi;

High fidelity hearing protection devices: Attenuation in human ears and manikin devices

Abstract

Flatness of attenuation was measured for high-fidelity hearing protection devices (HPDs) using microphone-in-real-ear (MIRE) and behavioral real-ear-attenuation-at-threshold (REAT) protocols. In addition, participants completed the words-in-noise (WIN) test with and without HPDs, and provided subjective ratings of perceived sound quality via surveys administered after listening to music with and without HPDs. Attenuation was also measured using a manikin device, with both the manikin-based microphone and the MIRE probe tube used to make measurements inside the artificial ear coupler. Among human participants, statistically significant correlations revealed decreased WIN performance and poorer music quality ratings as achieved HPD attenuation increased. There was also a statistically significant correlation in which shallower slope (flatter attenuation) was correlated with higher perceived music quality ratings. Achieved attenuation decreased in the coupler when the probe tube was inserted into the manikin, suggesting HPD seals were compromised by the probe tube. Consistent with the manikin data, attenuation in human ears was greater when measured using REAT, suggesting similar compromise of the HPD seal during MIRE tests. To assure high fidelity HPDs are well fit, REAT testing is recommended to verify both overall attenuation and flatness of attenuation in individual listeners.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!