
doi: 10.1121/1.5146806
Thirty-one individuals within the age-range of 18 to 27 years and 30 individuals within the age-range of 45 to 59 years participated in this study. Auditory thresholds were established in a sound treated booth from 250 to 16000 Hz. Words in noise scores were obtained under Sennheiser HD201 headphones through an iPad (NIH toolbox). The auditory thresholds were averaged across three frequency groups: 0.25, 0.5 and 1 kHz; 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10 kHz and 11.2, 12.5, 14 and 16 kHz. WIN scores were significantly correlated with all average thresholds. The correlations between the average auditory thresholds at 0.25, 0.5 and 1 kHz and WIN scores were −0.457 and −0.413 for the right and left ears. The correlations between the average auditory thresholds at 11.2, 12.5, 14 and 16 kHz were -0.699 for the right and -0.627 for the left ear. The correlation between average auditory thresholds at 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10 kHz for the right and left ears were −0.78 and −0.74. These findings suggest the importance of higher frequencies. [Funded by Grace Clements Communication Sciences & Disorders Research Endowment Award at West Virginia University.]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
