Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Integrating a remote microphone with hearing-aid processing

Authors: James M, Kates; Kathryn H, Arehart; Lewis O, Harvey;

Integrating a remote microphone with hearing-aid processing

Abstract

A remote microphone (RM) links a talker's microphone to a listener's hearing aids (HAs). The RM improves intelligibility in noise and reverberation, but the binaural cues necessary for externalization are lost. Augmenting the RM signal with synthesized binaural cues and early reflections enhances externalization, but interactions of the RM signal with the HA processing could reduce its effectiveness. These potential interactions were evaluated using RM plus HA processing in a realistic listening simulation. The HA input was the RM alone, the augmented RM signal, the acoustic inputs at the HA microphones, including reverberation measured using a dummy head, or a mixture of the augmented RM and acoustic input signals. The HA simulation implemented linear amplification or independent dynamic-range compression at the two ears and incorporated the acoustic effects of vented earmolds. Hearing-impaired listeners scored sentence stimuli for intelligibility and rated clarity, overall quality, externalization, and apparent source width. Using the RM improved intelligibility but reduced the spatial impression. Increasing the vent diameter reduced clarity and increased the spatial impression. Listener ratings reflect a trade-off between the attributes of clarity and overall quality and the attributes of externalization and source width that can be explained using the interaural cross correlation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Hearing Aids, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Speech Perception, Humans, Auditory Threshold, Female, Sound Localization, Hearing Loss, Noise

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!