Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Dichotic listening performance and listening effort for asymmetrical inputs

Authors: Kristina D. Milvae; Stefanie E. Kuchinsky; Olga A. Stakhovskaya; Matthew Goupell;

Dichotic listening performance and listening effort for asymmetrical inputs

Abstract

Binaural hearing typically improves speech understanding in difficult listening situations. Cochlear-implant (CI) recipients seek to gain binaural hearing benefits through bilateral implantation. However, the standard of care is currently sequential implantation, possibly with a long difference in the duration of deafness between the ears. Sequential implantation may cause interaural asymmetry in the quality of the signal, which could limit binaural benefits. A range of bilateral CI listeners, from those who experience binaural benefits to those who demonstrate interference, were recruited for this experiment. Listeners attended to one ear and reported digits heard in monotic and dichotic conditions. Perceptual performance and listening effort (via pupillometry) were measured. A control group of normal-hearing listeners were tested and were presented unprocessed, four-, and eight-channel vocoded digits, and the processing was independent across ears. It was hypothesized that attending to a poorer-quality signal in the presence of a better-quality signal would lead to poorer performance than in the monotic condition. Pupillometry was hypothesized to reflect the listener’s ability to perceive the poorer-quality signal in the presence of a better-quality signal. Results will inform strategies to maximize binaural hearing in bilateral CI listeners.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!