
doi: 10.1121/1.4883382
pmid: 24993214
The cochlea is known to be a nonlinear system that shows strong fluid-structure coupling. In this work, the monolithic state space approach to cochlear modeling [Rapson et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 3925–3952 (2012)] is used to study the inherent nature of this coupling. Mathematical derivations requiring minimal, widely accepted assumptions about cochlear anatomy provide a clear description of the coupling. In particular, the coupling forces between neighboring cochlear partition segments are demonstrated, with implications for theories of cochlear operation that discount the traveling wave hypothesis. The derivations also reaffirm the importance of selecting a physiologically accurate value for the partition mass in any simulation. Numerical results show that considering the fluid properties in isolation can give a misleading impression of the fluid-structure coupling. Linearization of a nonlinear partition model allows the relationship between the linear and nonlinear fluid-structure interaction to be described. Furthermore, the effect of different classes of nonlinearities on the numerical complexity of a cochlear model is assessed. Cochlear models that assume outer hair cells are able to detect pressure will require implicit solver strategies, should the pressure sensitivity be demonstrated. Classical cochlear models in general do not require implicit solver strategies.
Time Factors, 920107 - Hearing, Vision, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Models, Biological, Cochlea, Motion, Sound, Acoustic Stimulation, Hearing, Nonlinear Dynamics, Linear Models, Pressure, Humans, Computer Simulation, Speech and Their Disorders
Time Factors, 920107 - Hearing, Vision, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Models, Biological, Cochlea, Motion, Sound, Acoustic Stimulation, Hearing, Nonlinear Dynamics, Linear Models, Pressure, Humans, Computer Simulation, Speech and Their Disorders
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
