<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1121/1.4877689
The basic conflict between scientist and journalist is that each wants to tell a story—but not necessarily the same story. Can they agree on a version that grabs and holds the attention of most people but is still true to the science? Despite the risks of being portrayed inaccurately, should researchers make an effort to talk to the press? This talk will address these questions by synthesizing a series of interviews conducted with two acoustics professionals who have had significant media exposure, a print journalist, a radio journalist, and an academic specializing in science journalism.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |