
doi: 10.1121/1.4807034
pmid: 23862833
Effective communication between staff members is key to patient safety in hospitals. A variety of patient care activities including admittance, evaluation, and treatment rely on oral communication. Surprisingly, published information on speech intelligibility in hospitals is extremely limited. In this study, speech intelligibility measurements and occupant evaluations were conducted in 20 units of five different U.S. hospitals. A variety of unit types and locations were studied. Results show that overall, no unit had “good” intelligibility based on the speech intelligibility index (SII > 0.75) and several locations found to have “poor” intelligibility (SII < 0.45). Further, occupied spaces were found to have 10%–15% lower SII than unoccupied spaces on average. Additionally, staff perception of communication problems at nurse stations was significantly correlated with SII ratings. In a targeted second phase, a unit treated with sound absorption had higher SII ratings for a larger percentage of time as compared to an identical untreated unit. Taken as a whole, the study provides an extensive baseline evaluation of speech intelligibility across a variety of hospitals and unit types, offers some evidence of the positive impact of absorption on intelligibility, and identifies areas for future research.
Communication, Data Collection, Communication Barriers, Acoustics, Professional-Patient Relations, Hospitals, Speech Acoustics, Intensive Care Units, Patients' Rooms, Nursing Stations, Speech Perception, Humans, Hospital Design and Construction, Comprehension, Hospital Units, Perceptual Masking, Interior Design and Furnishings
Communication, Data Collection, Communication Barriers, Acoustics, Professional-Patient Relations, Hospitals, Speech Acoustics, Intensive Care Units, Patients' Rooms, Nursing Stations, Speech Perception, Humans, Hospital Design and Construction, Comprehension, Hospital Units, Perceptual Masking, Interior Design and Furnishings
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
