
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>A monaural binary time-frequency (T-F) masking technique is proposed for suppressing reverberation. The mask is estimated for each T-F unit by extracting a variance-based feature from the reverberant signal and comparing it against an adaptive threshold. Performance of the estimated binary mask is evaluated in three moderate to relatively high reverberant conditions (T60 = 0.3, 0.6, and 0.8 s) using intelligibility listening tests with cochlear implant users. Results indicate that the proposed T-F masking technique yields significant improvements in intelligibility of reverberant speech even in relatively high reverberant conditions (T60 = 0.8 s). The improvement is hypothesized to result from the recovery of the vowel/consonant boundaries, which are severely smeared in reverberation.
Male, Sound Spectrography, Speech Intelligibility, Auditory Threshold, Persons with Hearing Disabilities, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Cochlear Implantation, Electric Stimulation, Speech Acoustics, Cochlear Implants, Acoustic Stimulation, Adaptation, Psychological, Speech Perception, Humans, Correction of Hearing Impairment, Female, Audiometry, Speech, Perceptual Masking, Aged
Male, Sound Spectrography, Speech Intelligibility, Auditory Threshold, Persons with Hearing Disabilities, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Cochlear Implantation, Electric Stimulation, Speech Acoustics, Cochlear Implants, Acoustic Stimulation, Adaptation, Psychological, Speech Perception, Humans, Correction of Hearing Impairment, Female, Audiometry, Speech, Perceptual Masking, Aged
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 41 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
