Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Effects of reproduction methods and audio coding on word intelligibility with competing talkers

Authors: Kenji Ozawa; Junichi Nakagai;

Effects of reproduction methods and audio coding on word intelligibility with competing talkers

Abstract

Effects of reproduction methods and high-efficiency audio coding on word intelligibility were examined in a tele-collaboration system. Monaural, stereophonic, and binaural methods were studied. Transform domain weighted interleave vector quantization (TwinVQ) [Iwakami et al., Proc. ICASSP’95, pp. 937–940 (1995)] was used as the audio coding method. Intelligibility tests using word lists, in which word familiarity was controlled, were conducted under six conditions combining three reproduction methods with two conditions, i.e., with or without audio coding. In the experiments, three talkers pronounced different words simultaneously; a listener was then asked to selectively hear the word of a designated talker. Analyses of variance of the experimental results showed that intelligibility for the binaural method was higher than for the other two reproduction methods in both conditions with or without audio coding. Moreover, the benefit of the binaural method was demonstrated because intelligibility for the method with audio coding was higher than that for the stereophonic method without coding, whereas the amount of audio data in the former method was much smaller than in the latter, indicating that the binaural method with high-efficiency audio coding is useful for a tele-collaboration system. [Work supported by JSPS: KAKENHI (17560336) and RIEC, Tohoku Univ. (H18/A10).]

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!