Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Coherence and the Speech Intelligibility Index

Authors: James M, Kates; Kathryn H, Arehart;

Coherence and the Speech Intelligibility Index

Abstract

Noise and distortion reduce the sound quality in hearing aids, but there is no established procedure for calculating sound quality in these devices. This presentation introduces a new intelligibility and sound-quality calculation procedure based on the Speech Intelligibility Index [ANSI S3.5-1997]. The SII involves measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in separate frequency bands, modifying the estimated noise levels to include auditory masking, and computing a weighted sum across frequency of the modified SNR values. In the new procedure, the estimated signal and noise levels are replaced with estimates based on the coherence between the input and output signals of the system under test. Coherence is unaffected by linear transformations of the input signal, but is reduced by nonlinear effects such as additive noise and distortion; the SII calculation is therefore modified to include nonlinear distortion as well as additive noise. For additive noise, the coherence calculation gives SII scores identical to those computed using the standard procedure. Experiments with normal-hearing listeners using additive noise, peak-clipping distortion, and center-clipping distortion are then used to relate the computed coherence SII scores with the subjects’ intelligibility and quality ratings. [Work supported by GN ReSound (JMK) and the Whitaker Foundation (KHA).]

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Perceptual Distortion, Sound Spectrography, Adolescent, Speech Reception Threshold Test, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Loudness Perception, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Middle Aged, Speech Acoustics, Hearing Aids, Reference Values, Humans, Female, Noise, Perceptual Masking, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    181
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
181
Top 1%
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!