Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of pure tone thresholds obtained via automated audiometry and standard pure tone audiometry

Authors: David A. Eddins; Joseph P. Walton; Adam E. Dziorny; Robert D. Frisina;

Comparison of pure tone thresholds obtained via automated audiometry and standard pure tone audiometry

Abstract

It is likely that the role of automated audiometry will expand in both clinical and research settings in the next few years. A novel method for measuring pure tone thresholds using an automated threshold measurement method is reported here. The Automated Audiometry for the NIH Toolbox (AANT) test was developed for use in the NIH Toolbox multi-disciplinary evaluation battery which contains over 20 tests of sensory function and cognition. Development goals included low system cost, high accuracy, test administration time under 10 minutes, and automated calibration and measurement procedures suitable for use by evaluators without specialized training. Here we report the results of a validation study in which pure tone thresholds obtained using the AANT algorithm and hardware are compared to pure tone thresholds measured using the gold standard clinical method, standard audiometric hardware, and experienced examiners. Air-conduction thresholds will be reported for test frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, and 8000 Hz using both methods. Additional measures for each subject include otoscopy, screening tympanometry, and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults or Elderly. Data will be reported for 100 subjects between the ages of 4 and 85 years in age ranges.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!