Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Children’s and adults’ perception of speech in noise

Authors: Marianne Fallon; Sandra E. Trehub; Bruce A. Schneider;

Children’s and adults’ perception of speech in noise

Abstract

Age-related differences in identifying speech in noise were investigated by means of a computerized four-alternative forced-choice task. In experiment 1, children 5 to 11 and adults heard prerecorded instructions (e.g., ‘‘Touch the X’’) mixed with multitalker babble. Selections were made on a touch-sensitive screen and corrective feedback was provided. To control for age-related differences in sensitivity, signal-to-noise ratios yielding 85% correct were determined for each age group. The S/N difference between the youngest and oldest listeners was 5 dB, consistent with previous research. Equivalent additions of background noise had comparable effects for all age groups, which implies that previously reported age differences in noise were attributable to sensitivity differences rather than noise effects. Experiment 2 investigated the degree to which sentential context affected speech identification in similar noise. Children 5 and 9 years of age and adults identified the final word in high-context (e.g., ‘‘I carried the water in a pail’’) and low-context sentences (e.g., ‘‘He looked at the pail’’), with differences in auditory sensitivity controlled. Adults benefited ore from high sentential context than did younger children, indicating that limitations in cognitive processing adversely affect children’s perception of speech in noise. [Work supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada.]

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!