Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

On loudness at threshold

Authors: Mary Florentine; Hannes Müsch; Søren Buus;

On loudness at threshold

Abstract

Absolute thresholds for and loudness matches between pure tones and four- and ten-tone complexes were used to assess the form of the function relating loudness to sensation level, SL, at low and moderate levels. The components of the tone complexes had equal SLs and were separated by one, two, four, or six critical bands. Six listeners with normal hearing were tested. The thresholds for the multitone complexes indicate that they generally can be detected even when the level of a single component is a few dB below the threshold. The average detection advantage is consistent with predictions for multiple observations in independent, frequency-selective auditory channels, but differences among listeners are apparent. The loudness matches also vary somewhat among listeners. Five of the six listeners matched tone complexes composed of subthreshold components to a pure tone a few dB above threshold. This indicates that the loudness of tones at or even below threshold is greater than zero for these five listeners. A simple model of loudness summation was used to obtain loudness functions from the individual listeners’ loudness matches. The slopes of the loudness functions [log(loudness) plotted as a function of log(intensity)] generally exceed unity at low levels and are near 0.2 at 40 dB SL. This shallow slope at moderate levels agrees with loudness functions derived from data on temporal integration of loudness. The average loudness function derived from the present data also is in good agreement with a variety of previous data obtained by magnitude estimation, magnitude production, ratio production, and measurements of binaural loudness summation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Loudness Perception, Humans, Auditory Threshold, Female, Models, Biological

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    60
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
60
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!