
doi: 10.1121/1.423253
pmid: 9670543
Two experiments examined the effects of temporal overlap of speech gestures on the perception of stop consonant clusters. Sequences of stop consonant gestures that exhibit temporal overlap extreme enough to potentially eliminate the acoustic evidence of (at least) one of the consonants were obtained from x-ray microbeam data. Subjects were given a consonant monitoring task using stimuli containing stop sequences as well as those containing single stops. Results showed that (1) the initial consonant in the stop sequences was detected significantly less often than in the single stops; (2) bilabial gestures were considerably more effective at obscuring a preceding alveolar than the reverse; and (3) the detection rate correlated with an index of overlap between lip and tongue tip gestures. Experiment 2 employed stimuli that were truncated during the closure for the critical stop or stop sequence, so as to eliminate any information occurring in the acoustic signal at the stop release. This experiment showed that removing release information decreased detectability of the consonants generally. However, consistent with the observed gestural patterns, removing the release did not decrease detection of the alveolar stop when it was the first consonant of a sequence, indicating that there was no information about the alveolar stop present in acoustic realization of the second stop release. These experiments show that certain gestural patterns actually produced by English speakers may not be completely recoverable by listeners, and further, that it is possible to relate recoverability to particular metric properties of the gestural pattern.
Analysis of Variance, Speech Production Measurement, Phonetics, Speech Perception, Humans, Speech
Analysis of Variance, Speech Production Measurement, Phonetics, Speech Perception, Humans, Speech
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
