
doi: 10.1121/1.412275
pmid: 7860828
The results of an articulatory investigation of the supraglottal correlates of linguistic prominence in English, and a proposal of a unified description of linguistic stress are reported. Three models of stress are evaluated: that prominence expands jaw movement, that stress expands an abstract articulatory scale involving the opening and closing of the vocal tract, and that stress involves a localized shift toward hyperarticulate speech. A corpus of x-ray microbeam records of sensible speech is studied, within which the stress pattern is controlled and is checked by means of an intonational analysis. Jaw movement data yield similar results to earlier studies, but kinematic differences interpreted with reference to a gestural theory suggest that different subjects use different articulatory strategies to articulate stress contrasts. In addition, the jaw, lip, and tongue interact in the articulation of stress in subject dependent ways. Thus the articulation of stress should be formulated in terms of abstract articulatory goals, rather than in terms of individual articulator positioning. Finally, the data show that stress affects the articulation of nonsonority distinctions such as backness in vowels and point of articulation in consonants. A hyperarticulation model of stress is discussed in terms of these results.
Movement, Linguistics, Lip, Jaw, Speech Production Measurement, Tongue, Phonetics, Stress, Physiological, Humans, Speech
Movement, Linguistics, Lip, Jaw, Speech Production Measurement, Tongue, Phonetics, Stress, Physiological, Humans, Speech
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 266 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
