Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Temporal pattern discrimination and speech recognition under electrical stimulation

Authors: L M, Collins; G H, Wakefield; G R, Feinman;

Temporal pattern discrimination and speech recognition under electrical stimulation

Abstract

Discrimination of temporal patterns has been suggested as a relevant process in speech recognition by subjects with normal hearing [Sorkin, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 1695–1701 (1990)]. This paper investigates whether performance of Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant subjects on a temporal pattern discrimination task is an efficient and valid psychophysical measure of speech recognition ability. Stimuli consisted of temporal sequences defined by twelve 35-ms tones and eleven randomly generated temporal gaps separating the tones. A fixed-level same/different paradigm was used to measure the discriminability of these sequences as a function of their average correlation across a block of trials. On each trial, the ‘‘standard’’ sequence was generated randomly by drawing gap durations from a Gaussian distribution. The gaps of the comparison sequence were generated in a similar fashion with a specified average correlation with the gaps of the first sequence. Performance of implanted and normal hearing subjects decreased monotonically with increasing average sequence correlation. However, performance across implanted subjects ranged from that observed for acoustically stimulated subjects with audiometrically normal hearing to levels near chance. Comparing these data with measures of speech recognition in the same subjects, we have found that performance on standard speech recognition tests correlates with ability to discriminate among such random temporal patterns.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Cochlear Implants, Time Factors, Speech Perception, Humans, Deafness, Middle Aged, Electric Stimulation, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!