Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Investigation of low-frequency footfall noise in wood-frame, multifamily building construction

Authors: Warren E. Blazier; Russell B. DuPree;

Investigation of low-frequency footfall noise in wood-frame, multifamily building construction

Abstract

An investigation of low-frequency footfall noise in multifamily, wood-frame residential construction has led to the conclusion that, at present, there is no economically practical method of avoiding the perception of ‘‘thuds’’ and ‘‘thumps’’ in rooms beneath the walking surface. The IIC rating of a floor system is meaningless with respect to the perception of these low-frequency components of footfall noise, because the methodology ignores the frequency spectrum below 100 Hz; the peak energy in a footfall spectrum occurs at the fundamental natural frequency of the floor/ceiling system, which with typical light-weight structural framing is usually between 15 and 30 Hz. Although the construction of floated floors, or the addition of carpeting, is effective in attenuating mid- to high-frequency components of footfall noise, the data indicate that the amplitude of floor response at the natural frequency is actually increased. It is believed that this occurs because walking on a more resilient system results in a longer rise-time of the footfall waveform, which permits more low-frequency energy to be coupled into the system. The principal factor controlling the perception of low-frequency footfall noise is the point-stiffness of the structural floor system. In normal light-weight residential construction, the stiffness is usually much less than that required to avoid an audible disturbance. However, such problems are relatively rare in concrete structural floor systems, due to their substantially increased stiffness.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    29
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
29
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!