
doi: 10.1121/1.408945
Hoemeke and Diehl [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2422(A) (1993)] reported that the perceptual boundary between [+high] and [−high] English vowels occurs at an F1–F0 distance of 3–3.5 Bark and that this boundary is sharper than those for other height contrasts. This suggests that the 3- to 3.5-Bark distance, corresponding to the range of the ‘‘center of gravity’’ effect [L. Chistovich and V. Lublinskaja, Hear. Res. 1, 185–195 (1979)], affords a perceptually natural boundary. In the current study, listeners performed a 0.5-Bark step F1–F0 discrimination task on one of five series of single formant stimuli. F1 ranged from 2.5–7.0 Bark within a series, and F0 ranged from 1.0–2.0 Bark between series. Significant linear effects of both a formant/harmonic interaction (r=0.68) and F1–F0 distance (r=0.71) were found (multiple R2=0.94). However, a peak in discriminability near F1–F0=3–3.5 Bark was not observed. Thus the relatively sharp [+high]/[−high] boundary does not appear to be owing to enhanced discriminability. [Work supported by NIDCD.]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
