
doi: 10.1121/1.402776
pmid: 1737882
Binaural performance was measured as a function of stimulus frequency for four impaired listeners, each with bilaterally symmetric audiograms. The subjects had various degrees and configurations of audiometric losses: two had high-frequency, sensorineural losses; one had a flat sensorineural loss; and one had multiple sclerosis with normal audiometric thresholds. Just noticeable differences (jnd’s) in interaural time, interaural intensity, and interaural correlation as well as detection thresholds for NoSo and NoSπ conditions were obtained for narrow-band noise stimuli at octave frequencies from 250–4000 Hz. Performance of the impaired listeners was generally poorer than that of normal-hearing listeners, although it was comparable to normal in a few instances. The patterns of binaural performance showed no apparent relation to the audiometric patterns; even the two subjects with similar degree and configuration of hearing loss have very different binaural performance, both in the level and frequency dependence of their performance. The frequency dependence of performance on individual tests is irregular enough that one cannot confidently interpolate between octaves. In addition, it appears that no subset of the measurements is adequate to characterize the performance in the rest of the measurements with the exception that, within limits, interaural correlation discrimination and NoSπ detection performance are related.
Multiple Sclerosis, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Loudness Perception, Acoustics, Hearing Loss, Bilateral, Acoustic Stimulation, Hearing, Time Perception, Humans, Pitch Perception, Perceptual Masking, Psychoacoustics
Multiple Sclerosis, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Loudness Perception, Acoustics, Hearing Loss, Bilateral, Acoustic Stimulation, Hearing, Time Perception, Humans, Pitch Perception, Perceptual Masking, Psychoacoustics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 66 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
