
doi: 10.1121/1.402772
pmid: 1737878
The purpose of this study was to compare the role of frequency selectivity in measures of auditory and vibrotactile temporal resolution. In the first experiment, temporal modulation transfer functions for a sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) 250-Hz carrier revealed auditory modulation thresholds significantly lower than corresponding vibrotactile modulation thresholds at SAM frequencies ≥100 Hz. In the second experiment, auditory and vibrotactile gap detection thresholds were measured by presenting silent gaps bounded by markers of the same or different frequency. The marker frequency F1=250 Hz preceded the silent gap and marker frequencies after the silent gap included F2=250, 255, 263, 310, and 325 Hz. Auditory gap detection thresholds were lower than corresponding vibrotactile thresholds for F2 markers ≤263 Hz, but were greater than the corresponding vibrotactile gap detection thresholds for F2 markers ≥310 Hz. When the auditory gap detection thresholds were transformed into filter attenuation values, the results were modeled well by a constant-percentage (10%) bandwidth filter centered on F1. The vibrotactile gap detection thresholds, however, were independent of marker frequency separation. In a third experiment, auditory and vibrotactile rate difference limens (RDLs) were measured for a 250-Hz carrier at SAM rates ≤100 Hz. Auditory RDLs were lower than corresponding vibrotactile RDLs for standard rates >10 Hz. Combination tones may have confounded auditory performance for standard rates of 80 and 100 Hz. The results from these experiments revealed that frequency selectivity influences auditory measures of temporal resolution, but there was no evidence of frequency selectivity affecting vibrotactile temporal resolution.
Adult, Male, Auditory Threshold, Vibration, Touch, Sensory Thresholds, Time Perception, Auditory Perception, Humans, Female, Pitch Perception
Adult, Male, Auditory Threshold, Vibration, Touch, Sensory Thresholds, Time Perception, Auditory Perception, Humans, Female, Pitch Perception
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
