
doi: 10.1121/1.398800
pmid: 2324391
This article describes the use of auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) as a tool to assess nonlinear processes in the auditory system. Two-tone signals were used as stimuli to obtain AEPs in both animal and human subjects. Frequency analysis of the physiologic waveforms revealed frequencies in the evoked potential that were not present in the acoustic signal. The largest distortion product in the evoked potential corresponded to the difference between the two primary frequencies (f2−f1). This distortion product was present in all subjects tested. Other distortion products at frequencies defined by n(f2−f1), where n<5, were also present in some individuals. These frequencies represent distortion components generated from an even-order nonlinear system. Extensive acoustic and electric calibration procedures provided substantial evidence that the distortion products recorded in the AEP were biologic in origin and not the result of acoustic or recording artifact.
Auditory Pathways, Acoustic Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Animals, Humans
Auditory Pathways, Acoustic Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Animals, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
