
doi: 10.1121/1.393907
pmid: 3760337
Three different types of acoustical measures were compared as predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms of varied size and acoustical conditions. These included signal-to-noise measures, the speech transmission index derived from modulation transfer functions, and useful/detrimental sound ratios obtained from early/late sound ratios, speech, and background levels. The most successful forms of each type of measure were of similar prediction accuracy, but the useful/detrimental ratios based on a 0.08-s early time interval were most accurate. Several physical measures, although based on very different calculation procedures, were quite strongly related to each other.
speech transmission index, speech, Climate, Hearing Tests, Speech Intelligibility, Microclimate, early/late sound ratios, signal-to-noise measures, useful/detrimental sound ratios, Speech Acoustics, intelligibilité, Acoustic Stimulation, background levels, room acoustics, prediction accuracy, Confidentialité des entretiens, Humans, modulation transfer functions, acoustical measures, speech intelligibility, acoustique des salles, Speech security
speech transmission index, speech, Climate, Hearing Tests, Speech Intelligibility, Microclimate, early/late sound ratios, signal-to-noise measures, useful/detrimental sound ratios, Speech Acoustics, intelligibilité, Acoustic Stimulation, background levels, room acoustics, prediction accuracy, Confidentialité des entretiens, Humans, modulation transfer functions, acoustical measures, speech intelligibility, acoustique des salles, Speech security
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 136 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
