Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech

Authors: C L, De Filippo; B L, Scott;

A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech

Abstract

The ’’tracking procedure’’ is a method to train and evaluate the reception of ongoing speech. A talker and a receiver engage in a dialogue for a designated period of time in which the receiver reports his perception of successive segments of read text and is corrected by the talker until the text is repeated verbatim. Performance is measured in number of words of text repeated correctly per unit of time. The procedure is illustrated by its application to a project for training and evaluating use of a vibrotactile–electrotactile aid to lipreading. Differences between experimental conditions are described over time in terms of absolute words per minute, percent increment of aided over unaided words-per-minute scores, and percent of normal listening rate. Data from identification tests with syllables, words, and sentences are also presented. Tracking is suggested as an additional procedure for communication training in aural rehabilitation or classroom settings and for evaluation of other communication systems.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Phonetics, Teaching, Lipreading, Auditory Perception, Humans, Speech, Language

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    281
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 0.1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
281
Top 10%
Top 0.1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!