
doi: 10.1121/1.381029
pmid: 939873
In a laboratory experiment, human subjects were presented pairs of recorded 1-min traffic sounds. Subjects chose whichever sound of each pair they thought they would rather be exposed to on a regular basis; they also judged the relative dissimilarity of the sounds in each pair. The data were analyzed using multidimensional scaling techniques. The choice data showed that relative aversiveness of the sounds was related mainly to their subjective intensity. The dissimilarity data showed that subjects distinguished sounds on the basis of both subjective intensity and information, independent of intensity, about the source of the sounds. The single physical noise measure most highly correlated with the subjective intensity attribute from both sets of psychological data was Leq, the energy-equivalent sound level. Several new measures of the shape of the average power spectrum, and of the time-dependent variability in dBA levels, failed to add appreciably to the predictive power of Leq alone. Subject Classification: [43]65.75, [43]65.50; [43]50.70, [43]50.50.
Adult, Attitude, Auditory Perception, Humans, Female, Noise, Automobiles, United States
Adult, Attitude, Auditory Perception, Humans, Female, Noise, Automobiles, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
