Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The role of formant-frequency contours in the perceptual grouping of speech formants.

Authors: Brian Roberts; Robert J. Summers; Peter J. Bailey;

The role of formant-frequency contours in the perceptual grouping of speech formants.

Abstract

The perceptual organization of speech remains poorly understood. Recent research using sine-wave speech suggests that the ability of an extraneous formant to impair intelligibility depends on modulation of its frequency contour [Roberts et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 804–817]. This study examined the effect on intelligibility of manipulating the depth of this frequency variation. Three-formant (F1+F2+F3) analoges of natural sentences were synthesized using a monotonous glottal source (F0=140 Hz). Each formant-frequency contour was scaled to 50% depth about its geometric mean; this manipulation had relatively little impact on intelligibility. Perceptual organization was probed by presenting stimuli dichotically (F1+F2C; F2+F3), where F2C is a competitor for F2 that listeners must resist to optimize recognition. Different competitors were created by inverting the frequency contour of F2 about its geometric mean and varying its depth (100%-0%, 25% steps). Adding F2C typically reduced intelligibility; this reduction was greatest for 100%-depth, intermediate for 50%-depth, and least for 0%-depth (constant) F2Cs. These results indicate that competitor efficacy depends on overall depth of frequency variation, not depth relative to that of the other formants, and suggest that frequency-contour modulation influences across-formant grouping not only in sine-wave analogues but also in more speech-like simulations. [Work supported by EPSRC.]

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!